Pre-texts of repair: Digitisation and the role of metadata in engaging with colonial collections.

/

In The Sixth annual conference of the DFG Research Training Group “Identity and Heritage” that takes place in the Architekturforum at the Technische UniversitätBerlin on the 24th and 25th November 2022.  African Digital Heritage Founder, Chao Tayiana Maina, will be giving a keynote speech on the 25th November where she will highlight the place of metadata within the context of the digitisation of colonial collections. 

This year’s conference focuses on the objects that come into view when researching identity and heritage constructs: when things are ascribed symbolic meaning, and often multiple and potentially conflicting meanings, they can become relevant as “heritage” for perceptions of commonality and self. 

TALK ABSTRACT

Pretexts of Repair: Digitisation and the role of metadata in engaging with colonial collections

For decades, African stakeholders have campaigned for the return of material cultural heritage held outside the continent, drawing attention to the untold physical and epistemic violence of colonialism. In themselves, these objects represent the vast and complex indigenous knowledge systems disrupted by the colonial encounter and in their removal, a critical lack of access to immense repositories of historical knowledge.  

On the surface, the lack of access appears to have found amelioration through the wide uptake of digitisation initiatives. Large quantities of cultural collections previously inaccessible to audiences now accessible at the click of a button. Yet on a deeper level, questions of inaccurate information, biased descriptions and knowledge hierarchies continue to have a significant impact on how these digital collections are used and perceived.

This talk looks critically at the place of metadata within the context of the digitisation of collections removed within colonial contexts. How are current metadata practices harmful to the representation, continuation and production of historical knowledge? What epistemic violence and silencing is replicated when digitisation is positioned as repair without interrogating the power dynamics embedded in the data structures? 

Are there ways to remedy this or in the very least, create space for renewal and recovery amongst communities still coming to terms with the scale of the loss yet steadily reimagining alternative histories.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.